Reschke, Mark. Historicizing Homophobia:
Hamlet and the Anti-theatrical Tracts. Hamlet Studies
19 (1997): 47-63.
FEMINISM / HAMLET / METADRAMA / NEW HISTORICISM / QUEER THEORY
After acknowledging the complications of studying sexuality before
the late eighteen hundreds and the feminist efforts to historicize misogyny,
this article examines Hamlet to demonstrate how misogyny
intersects with a nascent form of homophobia, a cultural fear of male-male
sexual bonding articulated in the anti-theatrical tracts (49).
A survey of anti-theatrical propaganda reveals cultural anxieties about
effeminacy, sexual promiscuity (e.g., sodomy), and any behavior that
undermines social/patriarchal institutions (53). Hamlet seems
to embody the specific juncture of misogyny and fear of male-male sexual
desire that the anti-theatrical tracts begin to coordinate (55):
he clearly shows misogynistic tendencies with Gertrude and Ophelia;
he also voices his attraction to dead or distant men (e.g.,
Old Hamlet, Yorick, Fortinbras) because his fears of the sodomy stigma
restrict the expression of such sentiments to men only in relationships
in which physical contact is impossible (56); with Horatio, Hamlet
disrupts every moment of potential intimacy by interrupting himself,
trivializing his own thoughts, pausing, and then changing
the discussion topic to theatrical plays (57). Hamlets behavior
demonstrates the power of anti-theatrical homophobia to regulate
male behavior and expresses the anti-theatrical complex
that . . . anticipates modern homophobia (57). While the playwright
comes close to overtly acknowledging the cultural/anti-theatrical
association of sodomy with the male homosociality of theatre life,
A metaphoric treatment of anti-theatrical concerns, including
homophobia, corresponds toand possibly follows fromthe meta-theatrical
concerns that structure form and character in Hamlet
(58).
[ top ]